UK military accountability: New government should change how it decides to go to war

In 2020, Keir Starmer vowed there would be ‘No more illegal wars’ under his Labour Party leadership.

After a landslide election on 4 July, the Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights calls on the new prime minister and his government to change how the decision to go to war is made.

As it stands, the UK Prime Minister can authorise going to war without consulting Parliament. While a constitutional convention that Parliament should be involved in the decision to go to war supposedly emerged following the invasion of Iraq in 2003, recent deployments of British forces overseas have occurred without prior debate or vote and have often been based on controversial legal justifications.

To enhance democracy, ensure adherence to international law, and prevent extensive civilian harm, the UK should urgently strengthen democratic control over its war powers. Since the decision to go to war is made in everyone’s name, Parliament must have the power to say no and the right to access the full legal advice of the Attorney General and independent experts.

Video: Time to strengthen democratic control of UK war powers.

Learn more and see our suggestions for reform in our policy brief Strengthening democratic control of UK war powers in an age of remote and hybrid warfare.

Related Posts

2025 NGO Statement Ahead of the Open Debate on Protection of Civilians

Ahead of the annual Security Council Open Debate on Protection of Civilians on 22 May, the Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights and 20 other NGOs have released a joint statement calling on the international community to take urgent action to protect civilians and uphold their rights. Today marks the start of Protection of Civilians Week,

Read More »

UK military accountability: Comprehensive investigations vital to protect civilians and fulfil their rights

  As global conflicts escalate and civilian casualties rise at alarming rates, ensuring the centrality of international humanitarian law (IHL) to military operations is critical. Yet IHL is facing unprecedented threats – not only from deliberate attacks on civilians but also from its misuse to justify civilian harm under the guise of proportionality. In their

Read More »

‘I demand, I ask, I insist on reparations’: Views of Ukrainian civilian victims must be heard in peace negotiations – new report

(Українська мова йде за англійською нижче) With discussions around a potential political agreement intensifying, the issue of ensuring justice and redress for civilians harmed in the conflict is now critical, argues a new report published today by the Ceasefire Centre for Civilian Rights (Ceasefire) and the Eastern Ukrainian Centre for Civic Initiatives (EUCCI). Based on

Read More »

Search the site:

Post Categories:

Recent news and reports:

Scroll to Top