Copyright © 2008 American Psychological Association. Behav Neurosci. 2008 February; 122(1): 1–8. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
S. B. McHugh, T. G. Campbell, A. M. Taylor, J. N. P. Rawlins, and D. M. Bannerman
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
model: Group 4 × (Block
4 × S
39)], which found a significant main effect of lesion group, F(3, 35) = 2.90; p < .05), but no effect of block, F(3, 105) = 1.09; p = .36, or group × block interaction, F(9, 105) = 1.36; p = .22). Post hoc comparisons (Fisher's LSD test) revealed that the cHPC and vHPC groups chose the HR arm significantly less than the sham group (p < .05). The dHPC group also chose the HR arm less than the shams but this difference was not significant. A separate ANOVA was carried out, directly comparing performance of the dorsal HPC group to the ventral HPC group based on the a priori assumption that different patterns of connectivity to and from these regions implicate the ventral but not dorsal HPC in delayed-based intertemporal choice. However, the ANOVA revealed no difference between the groups, F(1, 18) = 0.35; p = .56) and no group × block interaction, F(3, 54) = 0.41; p = .22.
In the second stage of postoperative testing (Figure 1c), access to food in both the HR and LR arms was subject to a 10s delay. With equal delay in both arms, all groups showed a high and equivalent preference for the HR arm such that by the second block all groups chose the HR on more than 80% of trials. The two blocks of data in the second stage were compared to blocks 3 and 4 from the previous stage